Twitter's bitcoin hack signals political danger too

Latest News

Twitter's bitcoin hack signals political danger too

Thursday, July 16, 2020

Print this page Email A Friend!

SAN FRANCISCO,United States(AFP) — The hack atTwitterraises serious questions about in-house security at Donald Trump's favourite social media platform but, experts say, also threatens malign consequences for the integrity of November's US presidential election.

Here is what we know so far after hackers took over theTwitteraccounts of an array of political and business leaders— including Democratic White House candidate Joe Biden— apparently as part of a bitcoin scam:

- What happened? -

Twittersays it is still investigating but believes it fell victim to "a coordinated social engineering attack by people who successfully targeted some of our employees with access to internal systems and tools".

"Social engineering" describes fraudsters trying to manipulate their targets into divulging confidential information.Twitter's admission means that even IT-savvy staff at one of the world's best known internet companies are not immune.

Citing web screenshots and two anonymous sources apparently behind the hack, Vice reported that aTwitterinsider was responsible. One of the sources told the media group they had paid the employee.

"That (Vice report) is deeply troubling as these platforms have such influence," said professor Alan Woodward, of the Centre for Cyber Security at the University of Surrey in Britain.

"It maybe suggests that no one person should be able to use these internal tools: it's more difficult to bribe four eyes than two," he told AFP.

- What's the impact been? -

Limited, thus far.Twitterreacted quickly to deactivate the targeted accounts, delete the hoax messages and stop their onward transmission.

The fake posts said people had 30 minutes to send $1,000 in bitcoin to receive twice as much in return.

A total of 12.58 bitcoin— worth almost $116,000— were sent to email addresses mentioned in the fraudulent tweets, according to

Gerome Billois, Paris-based cybersecurity expert for the consultancy Wavestone, said early indications were that "at least one person has in recent days been trying to hawk access to individuals' certified accounts on the dark web, without success".

"It seems therefore that they decided to exploit the accounts themselves to try to make a quick buck," he said.

- What about longer term? -

That is what worries the experts more. If hackers could take over top-ranking accounts for small personal gain, they could also strive to subvert democracy itself.

"We should worry. It seems the hacking atTwitterwas in-house," commented Professor Anthony Glees, security and intelligence expert at the University of Buckingham.

"But if I were in Russian or Chinese or Iranian intelligence, I would be thinking about getting hold of somebody who works at the business to hire them," he said.

Even if internet companies respond swiftly, asTwitterappears to have done, hacked messages can do serious financial damage to victims in a short space of time.

"But politically, a fake or hacked tweet at a critical time could have a huge impact. Someone getting in there at the right time with the right kind of misinformation could absolutely sway the (November) election," Glees told AFP.

- How can we protect ourselves? -

The normal rules of good online housekeeping still apply: be wary of fake web links or "phishing" messages designed to extract financial data, create strong passwords, use two-factor authentication to log in wherever possible.

The trouble is, none of that helps when a company's own internal systems are penetrated, as happened withTwitter. So plain common sense was the best protection against the bitcoin hackers hawking a get-rich-quick scheme.

They used easy-to-spot "pressure tactics— by stating the deal would be open only for the next 30 minutes— and honeypot tactics to appeal to the desires of users, the potential for financial gain," said Vic Harkness, associate consultant at F-Secure.

"Potentially they could have made much more money by manipulating the prices of stocks, or could have pushed a political agenda," she said.

Now you can read the Jamaica Observer ePaper anytime, anywhere. The Jamaica Observer ePaper is available to you at home or at work, and is the same edition as the printed copy available at




1. We welcome reader comments on the top stories of the day. Some comments may be republished on the website or in the newspaper � email addresses will not be published.

2. Please understand that comments are moderated and it is not always possible to publish all that have been submitted. We will, however, try to publish comments that are representative of all received.

3. We ask that comments are civil and free of libellous or hateful material. Also please stick to the topic under discussion.

4. Please do not write in block capitals since this makes your comment hard to read.

5. Please don't use the comments to advertise. However, our advertising department can be more than accommodating if emailed:

6. If readers wish to report offensive comments, suggest a correction or share a story then please email:

7. Lastly, read our Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy

comments powered by Disqus



Today's Cartoon

Click image to view full size editorial cartoon